The Bull

Thursday 29

June, 2017 5:07 AM



TheBull PREMIUM

  • Trends
  • &
  • Opportunities

Do 679 of Australia's biggest corporations pay 'not one cent' of tax?

Do 679 of Australia's biggest corporations pay 'not one cent' of tax?

By Expert Panel 18.04.2017


Fabrizio Carmignani, Griffith University

 

… 679 of our biggest corporations pay not one cent of tax. – Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) Secretary Sally McManus, address to the National Press Club, Canberra, March 29, 2017. The Conversation

 

Speaking at the National Press Club in Canberra, Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) Secretary Sally McManus called for an increase to Australia’s minimum wage and criticised the Fair Work Commission’s recommendation to cut Sunday and public holiday penalty rates.

McManus said that “679 of our biggest corporations pay not one cent of tax”.

Was that claim correct?

Checking the source

When asked for sources to support McManus’ statement, a spokesman for the ACTU pointed to a media report and to the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) Report of Entity Tax Information for 2014-15, and provided this response from McManus:

 

According to the most recent ATO Tax Transparency Report, 679 companies with more than $100 million in income paid no tax in Australia in 2014-15.

 

The list includes such household names as Walt Disney, Sydney Airport, Qantas, Origin Energy and News Australia.

 

These companies can collectively be considered to be amongst the biggest operating in Australia – both in terms of income, and the prominent position they enjoy in the public eye.

 

Some of them are not Australian owned, and they may pay tax in other jurisdictions. However, they all operate in Australia, generate revenue from the spending of Australians and utilise existing infrastructure – like roads and ports – that were paid for by Australians.

 

So there’s something deeply unfair about a system which allows them to not pay any tax in Australia.

 

The ACTU also provided a spreadsheet listing the corporations it said had paid no tax.

Is that figure right?

The best source for information on how much tax Australia’s biggest corporations pay every financial year is the ATO. The ATO’s Report of Entity Tax Information – the same report the ACTU referred to in their response – is produced annually and shares information taken from the tax returns of:

 

  • Australian public and foreign-owned corporate entities with total income of A$100 million or more

 

  • Australian-owned resident private companies with total income of A$200 million or more

 

  • entities with tax payable under the petroleum resource rent tax, and

 

  • entities with tax payable under the minerals resource rent tax.

 

The report includes each company’s name, total income, taxable income, and tax payable.

For the purpose of this FactCheck, the relevant information is the tax payable by each of these companies. By looking at this data, we can see which companies didn’t pay tax in 2014-15, the most recent financial year for which this information is available.

How many companies don’t pay tax?

There are 1,904 companies included in the ATO’s 2014-15 report. Of those, 678 – or 36% of the companies listed – had no tax payable.

My count – 678 – is slightly different to McManus’s count of 679, and to the figure the ATO quoted on its pie chart here (the ATO has since corrected its report to reduce the number of nil tax payable taxpayers by one to 678).

The ACTU provided a spreadsheet listing the 679 companies that, in their view, paid no taxes. When I compared my count with the ACTU’s, I noted the ACTU included a company that I did not, a company named Tal Dai-Ichi Life Australia.

In the report I downloaded from the ATO website, Tal Dai-Ichi Life Australia is recorded as having total tax payable of A$56,171,148 for the 2014-15 financial year, so it shouldn’t be included in the count of companies that paid no tax.

Nevertheless, the difference is obviously minor. McManus was essentially correct.

Why do some companies pay no tax?

In general, there are two reasons why corporate companies pay no tax in Australia.

The first is that some companies are not making any profit. The concept of “total income”, which is used to identify the companies included in the ATO report, relates to revenue – not profit.

So, a company can have income (or revenue) of more than A$200 million, but that doesn’t automatically mean it has made a profit. Its losses or outgoings may outweigh its income. Only companies making a profit have to pay taxes.

Many of the companies that didn’t pay tax in 2014-15 were those in the energy/natural resources and manufacturing sectors – two sectors that were experiencing a downturn in that year and where profit margins were shrinking.

Proportion of entities with nil tax payable, by industry segment, 2013–14 and 2014–15. ATO corporate tax transparency report for 2014-15

The second reason could be tax avoidance or profit shifting. These situations arise when companies take advantage of the international tax system to reduce the amount of tax to be paid. For instance, companies may set up complex ownership arrangements that allow them to redirect profit to countries with lower tax rates.

While not necessarily illegal, these situations are closely monitored by the ATO to ensure that Australia receives its correct share of tax under international tax rules.

Verdict

Sally McManus’ claim that “679 of our biggest corporations pay not one cent of tax” was essentially correct. According to ATO records, 678 of Australia’s biggest corporations didn’t pay tax in Australia in 2014-15.

McManus’s figure of 679 included one company that did have tax payable in that financial year. But in percentage terms, the difference between 678 and 679 is negligible.

It’s important to note that when a company doesn’t pay tax, it doesn’t necessarily imply tax avoidance or profit shifting. A company might not be paying tax because it isn’t making a profit, even if its total income (that is, revenue) amounts to more than A$100 million or A$200 million. – Fabrizio Carmignani


Fabrizio Carmignani, Professor, Griffith Business School, Griffith University

First published on TheConversation




FROM THE NEWSLETTER

Gold Doldrums in June

As stock markets inevitably weaken, gold will... More

Amazon poses a double threat to Australian retailers

E-commerce giant Amazon has struck a deal to... More



WHAT’S ON THIS WEEK

week 30 June 2017
    • 26
    • CoreLogic Capital city house prices for the week just ended | 9:30 AM
    • 27
    • ANZ Roy Morgan Consumer Confidence weekly survey | 9:30 AM
    • 28
    • APRA Wayne Byres speaks at ACC in Australia event | 9:30 AM
    • 29
    • ABS Job vacancies for May | 11:30 AM
    • 30
    • MTS Ian Morrice speaks at Trans-Tasman Business Circle lunch | 9:30 AM

TheBull.com.au

TheBull.com.au

TheBull PREMIUM article search



Markets
Index: Points Change Percent

Featured Comment

It is hard to recall a mid-year trading season when so many items were on sale and discounts were so large.

Shining a dim light through the retail gloom

Broker buys

  • ASX Code
  • Company
  • Broker
  • SEASundance EnergyMorgans
  • ASHAshley Services GroupMorgans
  • DDRDicker DataWise-owl.com
  • GAPGale PacificWise-owl.com
  • AYSAmaysimKOSEC
  • ALUAltiumKOSEC

Broker sells

  • ASX Code
  • Company
  • Broker
  • DMPDomino`s PizzaMorgans
  • MTOMotorCycle HoldingsMorgans
  • MWRMGM WirelessWise-owl.com
  • HFRHighfield ResourcesWise-owl.com
  • MYRMyerKOSEC
  • EPWERM PowerKOSEC

Central Banks Rates

  • RBA1.50%
  • FED0.50%
  • BOE0.25%
  • BOC0.50%
  • RBNZ2.00%
  • ECB0.00%
  • SNB-0.75%
  • BOJ-0.10%

Upcoming dividends

  • ASX Code
  • Company, Div., Franking
  • Ex-Div.

Eight brokers like these stocks

  • ASX Code
  • Company Name
  • Consensus Target

Upcoming Floats

  • ASX Code
  • Company Name
  • Float Date

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS, AUSTRALIA'S LEADING BROKERS:



© Copyright The Compare Group Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.