The Bull

Thursday 19

October, 2017 5:16 AM



TheBull PREMIUM

  • Trends
  • &
  • Opportunities

Why consumers fall for 'sales', but companies may be using them too much

Why consumers fall for 'sales', but companies may be using them too much

By Expert Panel 20.03.2017


When you walk through an Australian mall you are bombarded with signs saying “buy one, get one free” and “70% off”, and shops seem to be perpetually running sales. This is understandable, as the presence of a sale sign, even without a price reduction, can increase sales. But there is such a thing as too much discounting.

Research shows that discounts become less effective as more products are put on sale. There’s also a limit to how much you can discount a product, as customers have a minimum amount they will pay for something.

How we determine ‘good value’

Prices affect consumers depending on factors such as how often they visit the store, how much they spend, whether they are visiting to buy or browse, and their ability and willingness to retain, process and recall prices.

Behavioural pricing research shows that consumers hold in their minds an internal reference price that is based on their previous experiences with a brand, competitor brands, or similar products. This internal reference price is central to how we make decisions about what to buy because it is how we determine if prices encountered in the market have changed and whether product offerings are a good value.

Reference prices become particularly important when a higher “regular” price is contrasted with the lower “sale” price. Consumers think something is a “good deal” when their internal reference price is higher than the sale price.

However, the difference between “regular” prices and “sale” prices can only be perceived at a certain point. In order to change behaviour the difference must be greater than what is called a “differential price threshold” – the minimum amount required to cause a change in perception.

To illustrate, it is unlikely that someone shopping for a shirt priced at $49.99 will react spectacularly if it were reduced to $47.49 – a discount of only 5%. But they might if it were reduced to $39.99 – a 20% discount. Thus, providing consumers with more meaningful savings increases purchases.

In this case, a 20% discount is more attractive not only because it is four times larger than 5%, but also because it changes the left-most digit in the price – from a 4 to a 3 ($49.99 to $39.99). This provides an important cue for consumers. Research shows that the left-most digit is very important in price perception – that’s why so many prices end in 99 cents.

Discounts can go too far

All consumers have a minimum and maximum price they are willing to pay for a product or service. For instance, a consumer may doubt the quality of a barber service if the price is less than $10 for a haircut. The same consumer may find the service too expensive if paying $100 or more.

The closer the price point of a product to their maximum/minimum price thresholds, the lower the consumers’ uncertainty about the purchase. One study showed that when a laptop was discounted by more than 50% there was a decline in willingness to buy.

Increasing the frequency of discounts can also have negative consequences for the brand and retailers’ image. Each time a consumer experiences a discount it is added to his/her reference price used for future purchases. The higher the frequency of discounts for a brand, the higher the likelihood that the sale price will become the new reference price, reducing consumers’ willingness to buy the product at full price.

Consumers soon learn that if they wait, they will get a better deal. This is why many Australian retailers offer consumers a guarantee of lower prices. For example, Coles’ pricing campaign assures consumers that they do not need to worry about future price increases.

The certainty associated with deals posted weekly gives consumers a sense that prices are not increasing and helps the brand to form a lower price image. Similarly, 7-Eleven has developed an app that lets consumers “lock in” a fuel price for up to seven days.

The takeaway

As we can see from the research into how prices affect consumers, we love a bargain. But it’s not as simple as lowering prices. We analyse products through a number of different lenses, including our preconceived notions about the product, brand and store.

Our internal price comparison system can be inaccurate for infrequent purchases, but it is decent for products we constantly buy. In the end, a deal is a good deal if we pay less than we expected to.

But that doesn’t mean companies should go crazy with discounts. This can have long-term impacts on perceptions about the product, brand and store. And that, in turn, has knock-on effects such as reducing the reference price for other products.

>> BACK TO THE NEWSLETTER: Click here to read other articles from this week's newsletter

Originally published by The Conversation. Author: Nicolas Pontes. Lecturer, QUT Business School, Queensland University of Technology


FROM THE NEWSLETTER

Investor Signposts: Week Beginning October 16 2017

There are two events that stand out in... More

The case for active asset management

According to Broadridge, the financial data... More

Key Factors Driving Treasury Decisions in 2017

The global economy is going through a digital... More

Top 30 shorted stocks

Each week we feature the top 10 shorted stocks... More



WHAT’S ON THIS WEEK

week 20 October 2017
    • 16
    • CoreLogic Capital city house prices for week just ended | 9:00 AM
    • 17
    • ABS New motor vehicle sales for September | 9:00 AM
    • 18
    • BHP September quarter review | 9:00 AM
    • 19
    • ABS Labour force for September | 9:00 AM
    • 20
    • FED Review of the four major banks | 9:00 AM

TheBull.com.au

TheBull.com.au

TheBull PREMIUM article search



Markets
Index: Points Change Percent

Featured Comment

A cultural shift away from third-party planned and mass travel, to independent planned and small-group travel, among older consumers, is an emerging trend that is benefiting RV providers.

Grey Nomads put gas in Apollo\'s tank

Broker buys

  • ASX Code
  • Company
  • Broker
  • SEASundance EnergyMorgans
  • ASHAshley Services GroupMorgans
  • DDRDicker DataWise-owl.com
  • GAPGale PacificWise-owl.com
  • AYSAmaysimKOSEC
  • ALUAltiumKOSEC

Broker sells

  • ASX Code
  • Company
  • Broker
  • DMPDomino`s PizzaMorgans
  • MTOMotorCycle HoldingsMorgans
  • MWRMGM WirelessWise-owl.com
  • HFRHighfield ResourcesWise-owl.com
  • MYRMyerKOSEC
  • EPWERM PowerKOSEC

Central Banks Rates

  • RBA1.50%
  • FED0.50%
  • BOE0.25%
  • BOC0.50%
  • RBNZ2.00%
  • ECB0.00%
  • SNB-0.75%
  • BOJ-0.10%

Upcoming dividends

  • ASX Code
  • Company, Div., Franking
  • Ex-Div.

Eight brokers like these stocks

  • ASX Code
  • Company Name
  • Consensus Target

Upcoming Floats

  • ASX Code
  • Company Name
  • Float Date

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS, AUSTRALIA'S LEADING BROKERS:



© Copyright The Compare Group Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.