The Bull

Friday 23

March, 2018 8:04 PM


  • Property

A land value tax could fix Australasia's housing crisis

A land value tax could fix Australasia's housing crisis

By Expert Panel 16.11.2015

Nicholas Ross Smith, University of Auckland and Zbigniew Dumieski, University of Auckland

The major cities of Australia and New Zealand are experiencing an extraordinary wave of speculation in their respective real estate markets. Over the past three years, the median house price to median income ratio has increased by 21.2% in Australia and 18.1% in New Zealand, a rate reminiscent of Ireland’s 20.5% before its housing crash at the time of the global financial crisis.

The rapid increase in property unaffordability on both sides of the Tasman has enriched a number of homeowners and speculators and made countless more eager to join the game. But it has had dramatic effects for businesses and landless families who find it exceedingly difficult to afford a place to live, work or operate.

Unsurprisingly, a lot of column space and political deliberation have been dedicated to finding a solution to the problem. Much of the analysis points to a lack of housing supply at a time of increasing demand as being the main driver of rising prices, resulting in a simple policy prescription: increase the supply of housing.

The main problem with this argument is it ignores the fact that it is land, not physical structures, that appreciates in value, making it an obvious area for speculation. Unlike houses or genuine capital, land does not depreciate or require maintenance. Instead, the value of land reflects its economic potential due to public expenditures on infrastructure (such as roads, schools or railway stations) in its vicinity and the effort and entrepreneurship of local workers and entrepreneurs.

When land prices soar, residential real estate becomes a more attractive investment opportunity than productive businesses. Land bubbles tend to produce two seemingly contradictory effects. Firstly, it produces urban sprawl as businesses and families are forced to seek cheaper land outside of the urban centres. Secondly, as owners are more interested in expected capital gains than any productive activities, much valuable land become idle.

Eventually, the burden of debt, lack of affordable land and investments based on wrong signals (e.g. luxurious condominiums promising high-profit margins) start affecting the real economy. As workers lose their jobs, they become unable to repay their debts and are forced to sell. Land prices finally stagnate and then fall, taking leveraged banks, speculators and people’s life savings with them. It is, therefore, clear that to escape this never-ending cycle, we need to focus on land.

Over a century ago, American economist Henry George suggested instead of taxing workers and entrepreneurs, governments should raise their revenue from land via a land value tax (LVT).

Indeed, both Australia (land taxes at the state level) and New Zealand (property rates at the council level) already have some taxation of land in place. But over the last century these taxes have become significantly debased due to the influence of various interest groups that secured exemptions or low rates. It is time to reconsider shifting the fiscal balance back onto land.

Unlike the land taxes already in place or the often suggested capital gains tax, LVT does not punish anyone for constructing houses or factories in the way that our current taxes do. As the supply of land is fixed, LVT becomes a cost of owning it. Consequently, it can bring in a decrease in prices as the owners of inefficiently used sites might feel compelled to sell or lease them to those willing to use them productively. Increasing the cost of owning land would drastically reduce the incentives for speculation.

Imagine central Auckland or Melbourne without vacant sites or dilapidated buildings. What is more, encouraging more efficient use of land is not only beneficial to economic growth and housing affordability, but also has a potential to substantially lower the costs of public infrastructure and encourage more efficient use of space and natural resources.

LVT would be a transparent and efficient alternative to our current taxes which are not only burdensome on businesses and families but also difficult and expensive to administer and enforce. It is impossible to hide land in a tax haven or a trust (trusts are not exempt from the current land taxes). Taxing it can be done cheaply and on the basis of publicly available information.

While LVT might persuade some modest-income earners to sell their valuable properties, most workers and homeowners would get net benefits from a reduction in taxes falling on their income (income taxes) and consumption (GST). Furthermore, a citizen’s dividend could be introduced in which part of the revenue raised from LVT is directly paid out to all citizens on a per-capita basis.

Given the multiple problems stemming from the rapidly expanding housing bubbles in Australia and New Zealand, introducing a tax on unimproved land values makes sense. Not only would it undoubtedly address house price inflation, it could also result in a more efficient use of land, mitigate urban sprawl, lower the burden on the natural environment and reduce the risk of real estate bubbles; all this without undermining the foundations of economic growth.

The Conversation

>> BACK TO THE NEWSLETTER: Click here to read other articles from this week's newsletter 

Nicholas Ross Smith, Professional Teaching Fellow, University of Auckland and Zbigniew Dumieski, Lecturer, University of Auckland. This article was originally published on The Conversation.


Why Wesfarmers is ditching Coles

Spinning off Coles is a great example of how... More

Investor Signposts: Week Beginning March 19 2018

CommSec Senior Economist Ryan Felsman takes a... More

Aust shares set to rise on tariff exemption

Australian shares look set for a positive start... More


week 23 March 2018
    • 19
    • CoreLogic Capital city house prices for the week just ended | 8:30 AM
    • 20
    • RBA Minutes of March monetary policy meeting | 8:30 AM
    • 21
    • MYR Half year results | 8:30 AM
    • 22
    • ABS Labour force for February | 8:30 AM
    • 23
    • SOL Half year results | 8:30 AM

TheBull PREMIUM article search

Index: Points Change Percent

Featured Comment

Some of the biggest disasters in the market have been industry roll-ups that grew too quickly.

The pick of \\\'industry roll-up\\\' companies

Broker buys

  • ASX Code
  • Company
  • Broker
  • FMGFortescueFairmont Equities
  • TLSTelstraFairmont Equities
  • IBNiBuyNew GroupRed Leaf Securities
  • MYQMyFiziqRed Leaf Securities
  • TCLTransurbanOrd Minnett
  • FMGFortescueOrd Minnett

Broker sells

  • ASX Code
  • Company
  • Broker
  • ORGOrigin EnergyFairmont Equities
  • BHPBHP BillitonFairmont Equities
  • FLTFlight CentreRed Leaf Securities
  • PLSPilbara MineralsRed Leaf Securities
  • QANQantasOrd Minnett
  • TAHTabcorpOrd Minnett

Central Banks Rates

  • RBA1.50%
  • FED0.50%
  • BOE0.25%
  • BOC0.50%
  • RBNZ2.00%
  • ECB0.00%
  • SNB-0.75%
  • BOJ-0.10%

Upcoming dividends

  • ASX Code
  • Company, Div., Franking
  • Ex-Div.

Eight brokers like these stocks

  • ASX Code
  • Company Name
  • Consensus Target

Upcoming Floats

  • ASX Code
  • Company Name
  • Float Date


© Copyright The Compare Group Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.